DistantNews
Support us
AI 'Improved' Famous Photographer's Work, Sparking Outrage
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Poland /Culture & Society

AI 'Improved' Famous Photographer's Work, Sparking Outrage

From Rzeczpospolita · () Polish

Translated from Polish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Context piece
  • The Ansel Adams Publishing Rights Trust (AAPRT) condemned the AI-generated, colorized version of Adams' iconic "Moonrise, Hernandez, New Mexico" photograph.
  • The trust stated that the alteration by Danziger Gallery owner James Danziger, using AI and Photoshop, was unauthorized and a violation of Adams' artistic legacy and moral rights.
  • Danziger defended his actions, asserting the original photograph is in the public domain and that the AI version served as a starting point for his own artistic interpretation.

A significant controversy has erupted in the art world over the unauthorized use of artificial intelligence to alter a famous photograph by Ansel Adams. The Ansel Adams Publishing Rights Trust (AAPRT) has strongly criticized a colorized, AI-enhanced version of Adams' iconic 1941 image, "Moonrise, Hernandez, New Mexico."

It's not about artificial intelligence or abstract creative experiments. This is fundamentally about artists' rights and moral rights โ€“ and about human dignity.

โ€” Ansel Adams Publishing Rights Trust (AAPRT)Explaining the core issue behind their objection to the altered photograph.

The dispute centers on James Danziger, owner of the Danziger Gallery, who presented the altered photograph at a recent art fair in New York. The AAPRT, which safeguards Adams' artistic estate, stated that Danziger proceeded without their knowledge or consent. They accused him of exploiting Adams' name, reputation, and most iconic work for commercial purposes, calling the incident "scandalous and disheartening."

In a statement, the AAPRT emphasized that the issue transcends abstract creative experiments, focusing instead on artists' rights and human dignity. They argued that using someone's legacy for private commercial gain without permission demonstrates a "glaring lack of ethical and professional judgment."

No one should use someone's name, reputation, and work for private commercial purposes without consent and honesty. The unauthorized use of Ansel's actively curated legacy reflects a glaring lack of ethical and professional judgment.

โ€” Ansel Adams Publishing Rights Trust (AAPRT)Condemning the gallery's actions and the lack of transparency.

Danziger, however, defended his actions by stating that the original photograph is in the public domain, a fact confirmed by legal counsel. He asserted that this status granted him the right to modify the image. Danziger also clarified that the AI-generated image was merely a "starting point" for his subsequent artistic work, suggesting a different creative intent than simply reproducing Adams' original vision.

scandalous and disheartening

โ€” Ansel Adams Publishing Rights Trust (AAPRT)Describing the incident involving the AI-altered photograph.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Rzeczpospolita in Polish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.