All of Europe Is Watching Saxony-Anhalt
Translated from German and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.
At a glance
- A guest commentary says the upcoming Saxony-Anhalt election could have major implications for Germany, with polls showing the AfD potentially doubling its 2021 vote share to more than 40%.
- The commentary argues that the CDU’s refusal to cooperate with the AfD and calls to ban the party could strengthen rather than weaken it.
- It attributes much of the AfD’s support to dissatisfied CDU voters and criticizes the lack of substantive debate over the party.
Saxony-Anhalt’s election next Sunday has become a test of whether Germany’s political firewall can contain the Alternative for Germany, according to Georg Vetter’s guest commentary.
The commentary says Chancellor Friedrich Merz appears weakened and claims that, if polling proves accurate, the AfD could lift its share of the vote above 40%. That would represent a doubling of its result in the 2021 state election, while an outright majority of seats cannot be ruled out, it says.
Vetter argues that the AfD’s growing importance owes largely to the clumsiness of its opponents. He says political debate over the party’s policies is largely absent, while its opponents mainly brand it as far-right. The commentary points to a Spiegel cover describing the AfD’s lead candidate in Saxony-Anhalt as “Germany’s most dangerous man.” The candidate distributed the cover as campaign advertising, and some journalists criticized the magazine’s exaggeration as helping the AfD.
Germany’s most dangerous man
The piece says AfD voters come mainly from the CDU, whose economic positions it describes as closest to those of the AfD. It also notes that the AfD’s lead candidate was once a CDU member. Vetter links the shift to dissatisfaction among Union voters with their party’s coalitions with the Social Democrats.
The commentary warns that neither the firewall nor a proposed ban would necessarily stop the AfD. If the party won an absolute majority, it says, a ban debate could instead help it. It recalls the CDU and AfD-backed election of FDP politician Thomas Kemmerich as Thuringia’s premier in 2020, an outcome Angela Merkel called unforgivable. Kemmerich resigned, while Germany’s Federal Constitutional Court reprimanded Merkel. The piece concludes that the Union continues to defend the firewall, to the benefit of the SPD.
The firewall is intended to signal to voters that every vote for the AfD is a wasted vote.
Originally published by Die Presse in German. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.