Allegations Cannot Be Treated as Findings, Says Chief Justice on Judge's Removal Plea
Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud stated that allegations should not be treated as established findings.
- He confirmed that he and other senior collegium judges are aware of concerns raised by a Supreme Court judge.
- These concerns reportedly relate to the acting Chief Justice of the Rajasthan High Court.
Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud has emphasized that allegations must not be presumed as conclusive findings, addressing a situation involving a Supreme Court judge's request for the removal of the acting Chief Justice of the Rajasthan High Court.
In a formal press statement, the Chief Justice confirmed that he, along with other senior judges of the collegium, has taken note of the specific concerns brought forward by the Supreme Court judge. This acknowledgment signifies that the judicial leadership is aware of and addressing the matter internally.
The statement clarifies the collegium's stance, highlighting the principle that accusations require due process and cannot be equated with established facts. This approach underscores the importance of procedural fairness within the judiciary, particularly when dealing with serious allegations against high-ranking officials.
He and other senior judges of the collegium have taken note of the concerns raised by Justice Mehta.
Originally published by Hindustan Times in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.