Another Failed Strategy?

Donald Trump’s campaign to economically isolate Iran arrived with sweeping language, but Tehran answered with defiance. The US president promised the “toughest sanctions in history,” while Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent described the measures as an effort to cut Iran’s “financial lifelines” and force a “regime endgame.”

“

We have seen this movie before.

The sanctions target 60 entities, individuals and vessels linked to Iran’s digital assets, technology, gold, aviation and shipping sectors. Bessent also warned that countries continuing to trade with Iran or use its financial system could face punishment and isolation. Yet he did not name target countries, specify the penalties or give a timeline for enforcement. No immediate action was taken against Iran’s biggest trading partners.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi dismissed the threats, saying, “We have seen this movie before.” Iranian officials called the sanctions an “act of state and economic terrorism” and said Tehran was “fully prepared” to respond. They also warned that any state, including neighbouring countries, that joined the US economic campaign would be treated as “an enemy.”

“

fully prepared

The article presents the pressure campaign as another sign of a widening gap between Trump’s rhetoric and his search for a negotiated exit. Before the sanctions announcement, Trump called Pakistan’s chief of defence forces, Field Marshal Asim Munir, and asked him to persuade Iran to resume talks. Munir then travelled to Tehran for discussions with Iranian leaders. Pakistan urged Trump to give diplomacy time, even as Washington moved ahead with what it called unprecedented pressure. The coexistence of mediation and escalation left the possibility of de-escalation open, while exposing the administration’s difficulty in forcing Tehran back to the negotiating table.

“

an enemy