Arbitrary changes and absurdities denounced in Jaime Sabines Poetry Prize

A significant protest has erupted within the literary community over perceived arbitrary changes and "absurdities" affecting the Jaime Sabines Poetry Prize. More than 40 poets, writers, and artists have signed a letter of protest and launched a Change.org campaign. They are demanding the restoration of the Jaime Sabines prize's international character and the national status of the Rodulfo Figueroa Poetry Prize. A key point of contention is the inclusion of an "arbitrary" moral judgment clause targeting contestants, which signatories argue infringes upon basic civil rights. The group also calls for immediate structural reforms to the 2026 award announcements for both prizes.

“

For the literary community, it is an absurdity that diminishes the international prestige of the award; furthermore, it is paradoxical that to celebrate the 100 years of a universal poet, like Jaime Sabines, it has been decided to shrink the contest to a strictly local scale.

The protesters specifically criticize the decision to limit the Sabines prize to a national scope, arguing it diminishes the award's international prestige. They find it paradoxical that to celebrate a "universal poet" like Jaime Sabines on his centenary, the competition would be scaled down to a strictly local level. This move, they contend, is a "disgrace" that reduces the award's global standing. The signatories also point out that mandatory social contribution clauses, requiring authors to declare no public complaints or gender-related sanctions, have been controversial in past award announcements by the National Institute of Fine Arts and Literature (INBAL). They believe the institution is overstepping its bounds by violating fundamental civil rights.

“

The institution is exceeding its functions by violating basic civil rights.

Beyond protesting the current award structures, the signatories are advocating for the permanent establishment of a Jaime Sabines Poetry Chair. This permanent chair, they propose, should be funded by Chiapas's culture department and universities. The selection of speakers for this chair could be managed by an autonomous council dedicated to preserving Sabines's memory. The aim is to create an enduring platform that fosters learning and keeps Sabines's legacy alive through academic engagement, creative output, and public outreach, moving beyond a static tribute to a dynamic engine of knowledge.

“

The designation of speakers could be made in conjunction with an autonomous council in defense of Sabines's memory. A Chair that brings together academia, creativity, and popular dissemination, moving away from simple static homage to turn his legacy into a living engine of learning.