DistantNews
Support us
Are you throwing money away on expensive SPF 50? The difference from 'thirty' is minimal, sellers are pulling our leg
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Czech Republic /Culture & Society

Are you throwing money away on expensive SPF 50? The difference from 'thirty' is minimal, sellers are pulling our leg

From iDNES · () Czech

Translated from Czech, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Sources not specified Context piece
  • The article discusses the minimal difference between SPF 50 and SPF 30 sunscreen, suggesting consumers are misled into buying more expensive products.
  • It highlights that the Czech Republic's iDNES.cz news portal requires users to consent to targeted advertising or subscribe to an ad-free premium service.
  • The text details the types of data collected and used for personalized advertising and content, as well as the options for users to manage their consent.

This article from iDNES.cz questions the necessity of high-factor sunscreens, suggesting that the difference between SPF 50 and SPF 30 is negligible and that consumers are being "pulled by the nose" into purchasing more expensive products.

The publication explains its advertising model, requiring users to either agree to targeted ads or opt for a premium subscription for an ad-free experience. It outlines the various ways user data, including browsing habits and interests, is collected and utilized by iDNES.cz and its 125 advertising partners to personalize content and advertisements.

Users are informed about their ability to withdraw consent for targeted advertising at any time, though doing so would necessitate a switch to the premium service. The article also touches upon the processing of data based on "legitimate interest" and provides instructions for managing privacy settings and objections.

DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by iDNES in Czech. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.