Arrest not proof of guilt, ex-minister Nnaji dismisses academic records reports

Former Minister of Innovation, Science and Technology Uche Nnaji has refuted recent media reports concerning legal proceedings over his academic records. Nnaji insists that these matters are still before the courts and should not be prejudged through public commentary.

His spokesperson, Robert Ngwu, issued a statement clarifying that recent reports had created misconceptions by conflating civil proceedings, alleged criminal investigations, and procedural court actions. The statement emphasized that the ongoing case, Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/1909/2025, is a civil matter initiated by Nnaji himself at the Federal High Court in Abuja. The objective was to seek clarification and obtain his official university transcript. Nnaji has not been charged with any offense nor has he appeared in court as an accused person.

The statement further noted that the matter was adjourned to October 20, 2026, after attempts to resolve the dispute out of court failed. It stressed that the proceedings are not a criminal trial and do not constitute a determination of guilt. Nnaji also addressed reports about the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC), stating he has not been formally served with any charges, hearing notice, or arraignment notice. He affirmed his intention to defend himself fully if any charges are brought against him, in accordance with the law.

Nnaji denied allegations of avoiding ICPC invitations or attempting to evade law enforcement, asserting his continued accessibility and public engagement. He argued that claims of him being in hiding are inconsistent with his public activities. Regarding an arrest warrant reportedly obtained by the ICPC, Nnaji described it as a procedural step to secure his appearance, not a conviction. His legal team is challenging this order at the Court of Appeal. Nnaji voluntarily resigned from his position to focus on clearing his name legally and expressed confidence in the judiciary, urging the public and media to distinguish between legal processes and guilt.