Artist Peng Chien-kuo Accused of Intimidation, Embezzlement; Acquitted on All Charges
Translated from Chinese, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Taiwanese artist Peng Chien-kuo was cleared of charges including breach of trust, embezzlement, and intimidation related to business disputes.
- Prosecutors found insufficient evidence that Peng gained illicit profits or that his former company suffered financial harm.
- The case was ultimately deemed a private business dispute over operating rights, leading to an acquittal for Peng and three others.
Taiwanese entertainer Peng Chien-kuo, along with three associates, has been acquitted of charges including breach of trust, embezzlement, and intimidation. The accusations stemmed from disputes with a former partner company over alleged business dealings in China and the handling of company funds.
The former partner had accused Peng of acting as an unarranged guest performer at a concert in China and of establishing a business in Xiamen, allegedly to circumvent profit-sharing with the company. Peng, however, testified that his performance was a favor for a friend and that he received no remuneration. He also stated that the Xiamen business was established after he had already agreed to withdraw from the company.
Prosecutors found insufficient evidence to support the breach of trust charges, noting that Peng had not gained illicit profits and the company had not suffered concrete financial losses. Regarding the embezzlement claims, the investigation revealed that while Peng had withdrawn approximately 460,000 New Taiwan dollars, the funds were later replenished to 750,000 New Taiwan dollars with the assistance of an accountant. This action, along with the completion of withdrawal and capital reduction procedures, indicated a settlement rather than criminal intent.
The intimidation charge arose from a WeChat message where Peng stated, "Then come at me, you can do whatever you want on and off the table," and "I will solve it in a necessary way." Prosecutors interpreted these remarks as emotional responses within the context of an investment dispute, rather than genuine threats of harm. Ultimately, the Taipei District Prosecutors Office concluded that the case involved a private dispute over business operations and management rights, leading to the decision to not indict Peng and the other three individuals.
Then come at me, you can do whatever you want on and off the table. I will solve it in a necessary way.
Originally published by Liberty Times in Chinese. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.