DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง United Kingdom /Culture & Society

Australian musicians sound warning note after Nick Cave, Kylie and many more slurped into AI training tool

From The Guardian · () English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Context piece
  • Prominent Australian musicians are upset that their work has been included in datasets used to train artificial intelligence without permission.
  • Artists like Nick Cave, Kylie Minogue, and Powderfinger found their songs scraped from the internet for AI training, leading to feelings of violation and frustration.
  • Musicians and licensing organizations express concern that AI training on copyrighted material undermines artists' ability to negotiate fair terms and dehumanizes the creative process.

Australian musicians are expressing outrage after discovering their original songs have been scraped from the internet and used to train artificial intelligence models without their consent. Paul Dempsey of Something For Kate and Bernard Fanning of Powderfinger are among the artists who found their entire musical output included in datasets used for AI training.

Itโ€™s frustrating this is happening. Every negotiated agreement and contract Iโ€™ve ever gone into in my career with whatever entity or record label is all just rendered useless.

โ€” Paul DempseyPaul Dempsey expressed his frustration over his music being used for AI training without permission.

Dempsey stated that the situation renders all his past negotiated agreements with record labels useless, as artists' ability to secure fair terms for their content is being eroded. "Itโ€™s frustrating this is happening. Every negotiated agreement and contract Iโ€™ve ever gone into in my career with whatever entity or record label is all just rendered useless," he told AAP.

Bernard Fanning argued that using original songs to produce AI content is dehumanizing. "Do we want robots telling our stories and synthesising our feelings? Because itโ€™s not human. The whole point of art is to humanise our feelings, to express how weโ€™re feeling across the whole range of emotions," he said. Songwriter Darren Hayes echoed these sentiments, describing the use of his 30-year career's work as "stolen."

Do we want robots telling our stories and synthesising our feelings? Because itโ€™s not human. The whole point of art is to humanise our feelings, to express how weโ€™re feeling across the whole range of emotions.

โ€” Bernard FanningBernard Fanning argued that AI-generated content lacks human emotion and the essence of art.

Music licensing organization APRA AMCOS confirmed that major tech platforms have not engaged in discussions, instead lobbying governments and proposing policy papers. The datasets, including millions of music tracks and lyrics, were compiled by groups like Sleeping AI and LAION. While inclusion in a dataset doesn't definitively prove usage by AI companies, it serves as evidence of creative work being collected.

I absolutely feel violated that all of the hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of hours, blood, sweat and tears that Iโ€™ve put into my music, along with every other musician, has been stolen and served up like french fries to a piece of software that spits out shit.

โ€” Darren HayesDarren Hayes described his feelings of violation after discovering his music was used for AI training.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by The Guardian. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.