Austria's Wehrdienstreform: FPÖ and Greens Demand Input for Parliamentary Approval

Austria's governing coalition has announced a political agreement to extend mandatory military service, a move that necessitates the support of either the Freedom Party (FPÖ) or the Greens to secure the required two-thirds majority in parliament. However, a concrete legislative text for negotiation is still pending, and both opposition parties have voiced significant criticisms of the presented package.

“

I expect an invitation to negotiations to finally contribute some expertise.

The FPÖ, through its defense spokesperson Volker Reifenberger, expressed disappointment, stating that the Wehrdienstkommission (Military Service Commission) had proposed a better plan. Reifenberger criticized the agreed-upon "6plus3 model", six months of basic military service plus three months of subsequent service, as too short. He particularly condemned the regulations for civilian service as "messed up," arguing they would lead to two weak cohorts in the Bundesheer and militia, requiring prolonged support.

“

Here, people obviously negotiated who have no idea about the subject matter.

Reifenberger also highlighted concerns about a shortage of non-commissioned officers, stating, "We have far too few non-commissioned officers to lead the troops. What good are more conscripts if no one can lead them? Non-commissioned officers are the backbone of any army." He advocated for increased incentives for soldiers to become NCOs. Furthermore, the FPÖ questioned the budget implications, suggesting that the current agreement is "less for more money" and deeming Finance Minister Markus Marterbauer's exclusion of fresh funds unrealistic, arguing that increased costs should not compromise equipment procurement.

“

The regulation with civilian service is a messed-up mess. You only lose time.

The Greens, represented by defense spokesperson David Stögmüller, also indicated that many questions remain unanswered, labeling the current proposal as "chaos." A key point of contention for the Greens involves the militia exercises, which are part of the proposed six months of basic service followed by three months of troop or militia duty. The exact allocation of these three months between troop and militia exercises remains unclear, as does the duration of militia exercises within a ten-year period.

“

We have far too few non-commissioned officers to lead the troops. What good are more conscripts if no one can lead them? Non-commissioned officers are the backbone of any army.