Author argues left-wing does not suffer from 'contact anxiety' regarding extremism

Conservative politician Ola Svenneby has asserted that the left-wing suffers from "contact anxiety" and fails to adequately address Islamist extremism. He suggests that this reluctance stems from an unwillingness to speak plainly about the threat. However, this perspective is challenged by a writer who argues that the issue is far more complex than a simple critique of Islam.

The author, who identifies as gay, emphasizes that while Islamist extremism is a dangerous threat requiring open dialogue and action, reducing the problem to Islam alone is a misstep. Drawing from personal experience within conservative religious environments where homosexuality was condemned, the author points out that religion can be a tool to legitimize homophobia. This personal background informs the critique that Svenneby's analysis stops short of understanding why LGBTQ+ individuals are repeatedly targeted.

Furthermore, the author contends that Svenneby's analysis overlooks the broader ideological underpinnings of extremism. While acknowledging the need to condemn Islamist terror, the author clarifies that Islamism is an ideology, not solely a religion. Similar anti-LGBTQ+ sentiments are found in Christian fundamentalism, far-right extremism, and other authoritarian ideologies. The common thread, according to the author, is a worldview that denies LGBTQ+ individuals the same freedoms and dignity afforded to others. This broader understanding is crucial for effectively confronting extremism in all its forms.

The piece also refutes Svenneby's claim that no imams publicly support LGBTQ+ rights. The author states that various Muslim communities have shown solidarity with LGBTQ+ individuals, particularly after recent attacks. The argument is that focusing solely on the religious affiliation of perpetrators misses the larger picture of extremist ideologies that fuel hatred and violence against marginalized groups. A comprehensive approach requires understanding the shared roots of intolerance across different movements.

“

Den same forakta for skeive menneske finst i kristen fundamentalisme, i høgreekstreme miljø og i andre autoritære ideologiar.