Brazil's Supreme Court bypasses constitutional spending cap, columnist says
Translated from Portuguese, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Brazil's Supreme Court (STF) has relaxed rules on extra payments for public servants, effectively bypassing the constitutional spending cap.
- Columnist Fernando Schรผler argues this decision undermines the constitutional ceiling on salaries.
- Schรผler emphasizes that such changes should be debated and decided by Congress, not the judiciary.
Brazil's Supreme Court (STF) has made a decision that effectively circumvents the nation's constitutional spending cap, allowing public servants to receive additional payments beyond the established limit. Columnist Fernando Schรผler criticizes this move, stating that the STF has dismantled the constitutional ceiling by permitting these extra "penduricalhos," or perks. He explains that the court's approval of an "extrateto" โ an additional 35% on top of the current R$46,366 limit, amounting to over R$16,200 more โ signifies the end of the constitutional salary cap. Schรผler argues that any alteration to the salary cap for public servants should be a matter for the National Congress. He believes that if there is a consensus in Brasรญlia that the R$46,360 cap is insufficient, the debate and decision-making process must occur within the legislative branch, involving societal discussion and deliberation. The columnist concludes that the STF's action, taken unilaterally, represents a "jeitinho" โ a Brazilian colloquialism for finding a workaround or loophole โ to break a constitutional rule rather than following democratic procedures.
If the Supreme Court approved, on the issue of perks, the possibility of an extra-ceiling of 35% of the value of the ceiling that today is R$ 46,366.00 โ means R$ 16,200.00 more than the ceiling โ that this can be paid in the form of seniority bonuses, then the constitutional ceiling is over.
Originally published by Estadรฃo in Portuguese. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.