Bureaucracy: Lauri Lappalainen's journey through official channels after surrogate birth
Translated from Finnish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Lauri Lappalainen, a single father in Finland, had his child through a surrogate birth using his sperm and an anonymous donor's eggs.
- Kela, the Social Insurance Institution of Finland, denied his application for child maintenance support.
- The denial was based on the argument that the surrogate mother is legally considered the child's parent responsible for maintenance under Finnish law.
Lauri Lappalainen, a 53-year-old single father in Finland, is navigating a bureaucratic maze after his child was born via surrogacy. His son, now just over a year old, was conceived using Lappalainen's sperm and eggs from an anonymous donor, with the embryo transferred to a surrogate mother's womb.
Despite being the sole provider for his son, relying on a partial disability pension and social assistance, Lappalainen faced a setback when his application for child maintenance support from Kela, the Social Insurance Institution of Finland, was rejected. Lappalainen describes himself as a full-time father, currently managing with limited income.
The reason for the denial, as explained by Kela, is that under Finnish law, the surrogate mother is legally recognized as the parent responsible for the child's maintenance. This ruling has left Lappalainen in a difficult position, highlighting the complex legal and social challenges surrounding surrogacy and parental rights in Finland.
Originally published by Helsingin Sanomat in Finnish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.