Calls for constitutional accountability
Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Politicians should be held accountable for misusing the Constitution during election campaigns, a university lecturer urged.
- Rajen Prasad stated that misleading constitutional information confuses voters and influences election decisions.
- A lawyer supported clearer constitutional wording and stronger rights protection to prevent abuse.
Politicians must face consequences if they misuse or misinterpret the Constitution during election campaigns, according to a University of the South Pacific lecturer. Rajen Prasad told the Constitutional Review Commission that misleading statements about the Constitution can confuse voters and sway their decisions at the polls.
"Politicians and ministers should be taken to task when they use the Constitution wrongly during their campaigning period," Prasad said. "Time and again, I have seen and heard them say, โThis is in the Constitution,โ when it is not."
Prasad emphasized that leaders need a thorough understanding of the Constitution before making public statements or proposing amendments. Lawyer Barbara Malimali agreed, advocating for clearer constitutional language and enhanced protection of rights to prevent any potential abuse.
The Constitutional Review Commission has been urged to prioritize clear wording and robust rights protections within the Constitution. This aims to prevent its misuse or misunderstanding, ensuring a more informed and fair electoral process for all citizens.
Politicians and ministers should be taken to task when they use the Constitution wrongly during their campaigning period. Time and again, I have seen and heard them say, โThis is in the Constitution,โ when it is not.
Originally published by FBC News. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.