DistantNews
Support us
Cameras capture crime scenes but don't always guarantee justice in Lithuania
๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡น Lithuania /Crime & Justice

Cameras capture crime scenes but don't always guarantee justice in Lithuania

From Delfi · () Lithuanian

Translated from Lithuanian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Sources not specified Context piece
  • Surveillance cameras are frequently used in criminal investigations in Kaunas, Lithuania, but their effectiveness varies significantly.
  • Factors like poor image quality, inadequate lighting, and incorrect camera angles can render footage useless for identifying suspects or vehicles.
  • While cameras can aid investigations, criminologists are skeptical about their ability to deter crime, especially professionally planned offenses.

In Kaunas, Lithuania, surveillance cameras are a common sight, often becoming a crucial part of criminal investigations. Police confirm they regularly utilize footage, though they do not maintain specific statistics on how often these recordings lead to breakthroughs.

If the crime scene or circumstances related to it fall within the camera's field of view, such recordings are useful in investigating all criminal offenses.

โ€” Kaunas PoliceDescribing the general utility of surveillance footage in investigations.

However, the presence of a camera does not guarantee a solved case. The quality of the footage is paramount. Investigators note that poor image resolution, insufficient lighting, or an unfavorable camera angle can render recordings useless. Similarly, if a suspect's face is obscured or a vehicle's license plate is unreadable, the video evidence loses its investigative value.

The perpetrator of the incident could not be identified in the end because there was a lack of evidence.

โ€” IevaExpressing disappointment after a crime where a non-functioning camera prevented identification.

One Kaunas resident, Ieva (name changed), shared a frustrating experience from six years ago. After being injured by a projectile from an air-gun in Draugystฤ—s Park, she discovered that a nearby surveillance camera, which she believed would help identify the perpetrator, was not functioning. The lack of usable evidence ultimately meant the culprit was never found.

Cameras slightly protect against situational theft, but only in cases where the motive arises suddenly. If thefts are carried out professionally, the risk of cameras is assessed and resolved.

โ€” Gintautas SakalauskasExplaining the limited impact of cameras on professional criminal activity.

Criminologist Gintautas Sakalauskas expresses skepticism about the deterrent effect of cameras. He suggests they may have a minor impact on spontaneous crimes like petty theft but are unlikely to deter individuals who meticulously plan their offenses. "Cameras can help investigate crimes, but again, only a very limited number of them," Sakalauskas stated, emphasizing that their primary benefit often lies in post-crime analysis rather than prevention.

Cameras can help investigate crimes, but again, only a very limited number of them.

โ€” Gintautas SakalauskasSummarizing the investigative benefits and limitations of surveillance cameras.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Delfi in Lithuanian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.