Can TVET Produce PhDs? Malaysia Explores Advanced Vocational Training

Malaysia is embarking on a significant transformation of its Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) system, aiming to elevate it to advanced levels, including master's and doctoral degrees. This initiative, dubbed TVET Termaju (Advanced TVET), seeks to align vocational training with professional practices and industry demands, moving beyond traditional academic pathways. The core question is whether this high-level TVET is truly relevant for Malaysia's future.

“

The question is, is the TVET pathway up to the doctoral level truly relevant for Malaysia? Based on global economic developments and the experience of developed countries like Germany, the answer is yes, but its implementation needs to adopt a different approach from the traditional academic system.

Drawing inspiration from countries like Germany, which excels in TVET through its dual training system combining industrial practice with institutional learning, Malaysia's approach emphasizes practical application. Germany's Universities of Applied Sciences (Fachhochschule) and Technical Universities of Applied Sciences (Technische Hochschule) focus on industry-oriented education, problem-solving, and technological innovation, including AI and robotics. This model is seen as highly applicable for Malaysia's TVET Levels 6 to 8, which should produce professional technologists, industry innovators, and researchers capable of tackling real-world industrial challenges like smart factories and digital transformation.

“

Malaysia cannot simply change the name of vocational programs to degrees without structural and educational philosophy changes. Advanced TVET needs to be built on professional and industrial approaches, not by fully imitating the conventional academic model.

However, the article highlights several significant hurdles. Public perception remains a major challenge, with TVET still often viewed as a pathway for lower-skilled workers rather than a route to advanced technical professions. Industry engagement in curriculum development and training is also insufficient, with most talent initiatives originating from the government. There's a risk that advanced TVET programs could lose their distinct identity if they become too heavily influenced by traditional academic structures.

“

However, Malaysia still faces several major challenges. First, public perception of TVET is not yet on par with traditional academic pathways. TVET is still considered a solution for producing skilled workers limited in STEM capabilities.

Furthermore, Malaysia's TVET landscape is fragmented, involving multiple ministries and agencies, leading to coordination problems, functional overlap, and standardization issues. While efforts like the National TVET Council aim to harmonize the system, a truly holistic and integrated approach is yet to be fully realized. Unlike Germany's well-structured, industry-aligned ecosystem, Malaysia's system requires more robust coordination and a clearer vision to ensure its advanced TVET initiatives achieve their intended impact.

“

Second, industry involvement in curriculum development and training is still not strong enough. Most talent formation initiatives come from the government.