DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ Taiwan /Culture & Society

Cat summoned for jury duty, owner's attempts to excuse feline result in laughter

From Liberty Times · () Chinese

Translated from Chinese, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Sources not specified Outcome reported
  • A cat in the United States received a jury duty summons, leading to a series of absurd attempts by its owner to get it excused.
  • Despite providing veterinary proof of the cat's inability to serve, the court repeatedly rejected the requests, even threatening contempt of court charges.
  • The situation was eventually resolved when a supervisor admitted a data entry error, apologized, and removed the cat from the voter registry.

A cat's jury duty summons has become an internet sensation, highlighting a bizarre bureaucratic mix-up. The feline, named Felix, received an official notice from the county, listing his full name as registered with his veterinarian. His owner's attempts to explain the situation were met with frustratingly literal interpretations of the law.

Felix is a legal cat.

โ€” OwnerDuring a phone call with the county clerk's office.

"Is Felix a legal resident of this county?" a clerk reportedly asked. "He's a legal cat," the owner replied. The clerk insisted that if the name matched, jury duty was mandatory or an exemption was required. When the owner asked for an exemption option for "being a cat," the clerk suggested "medical reasons."

The patient is unable to perform his duties due to species-related limitations, including the inability to speak, read, or understand legal proceedings.

โ€” VeterinarianIn a medical exemption statement for the cat.

This led to a comical quest for a doctor's note. A veterinarian, after being presented with the situation, wrote a statement confirming the patient's "species-related limitations, including the inability to speak, read, or understand legal proceedings, rendering him unable to perform his duties."

This is a mandatory summons. Failure to appear will be considered contempt of court.

โ€” Court NoticeAfter the veterinary exemption was rejected.

Even this was rejected, with the court threatening contempt charges. In a final, absurd act, the owner brought Felix, in his carrier, to the courthouse. The sight of the cat prompted disbelief from the staff, who eventually escalated the issue to a supervisor. The supervisor acknowledged the data error, apologized, and promised to remove Felix from the voter rolls. The owner humorously speculated that Felix would vote for whichever party promised unlimited "tuna paste."

He's a cat.

โ€” Court StaffUpon seeing the cat at the courthouse.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Liberty Times in Chinese. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.