DistantNews
Support us
CDU's Laumann calls poll numbers 'bad,' expresses concern for country
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Germany /Elections & Politics

CDU's Laumann calls poll numbers 'bad,' expresses concern for country

From Die Zeit · () German

Translated from German, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News From a news agency Context piece

- Karl-Josef Laumann, a leading member of Germany's CDU party, expressed concern over the party's low poll numbers, calling 21-22%

Karl-Josef Laumann, a prominent figure in Germany's Christian Democratic Union (CDU), has voiced significant concern over his party's current standing in opinion polls. "Of course, poll numbers of 21, 22 percent for the CDU are bad," Laumann stated, referencing the figures in a ZDF television program. He added that such results would make one "anxious, also for our country."

Laumann acknowledged a "certain uncertainty" within the party, emphasizing the need to continually articulate the CDU's value. He suggested that while there might not be widespread discontent among the party base regarding national leader Friedrich Merz, there is a clear desire for improved communication. The NRW Minister of Labor also indicated that no easy legislation was expected before Christmas, stressing the importance of passing laws that a majority of the population would find acceptable.

Regarding pension reforms, Laumann supported the Rentenkommission's recommendation to abolish penalty-free retirement after 45 years of contributions. However, he also stressed the need to focus on individuals unable to work until the standard retirement age due to health reasons. He described proposals like a mandatory, equally financed capital-based pension as beneficial for employees, calling it a "pound" from the perspective of labor. Laumann also welcomed the continued linkage of pension increases to wage development.

DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Die Zeit in German. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.