Child-rearing support cannot be artificially limited

Polish authorities are reminded that child benefits, such as the 800+ program (formerly 500+), should not be arbitrarily reduced, especially in cases of shared custody following parental separation. The Supreme Administrative Court (NSA) issued a ruling on February 4, 2026, emphasizing that an automatic reduction of benefits is not justified when one parent applies for the payment, provided both parents consent to the disbursement and the funds are used for the child's needs.

This clarification comes amid a perceived tendency by officials to limit these crucial financial supports, particularly for parents who, despite separating, continue to co-parent their children amicably. The NSA's decision serves as a critical reminder that the principle of shared custody does not automatically equate to a halved benefit, especially when the arrangement is mutually agreed upon and demonstrably serves the child's welfare.

The article points to a specific instance where ZUS (the Social Insurance Institution) demanded a father repay 500+ benefits. The NSA's intervention underscores that such automatic deductions are unacceptable and that each case requires individual assessment based on parental agreement and the child's best interests. This ruling is significant for many families relying on these benefits, ensuring that co-parenting arrangements do not inadvertently penalize parents financially.