Climate Pledges: Progressive, Justice Parties Lead; Democrats Link to Economy; Others Absent

As South Korea gears up for the June 3rd local elections, a closer examination of the major parties' platforms reveals a stark contrast in their commitment to climate action. Our analysis at Hankyoreh shows that the Progressive Party and the Justice Party stand out with the most detailed and proactive climate response policies, aiming for a significant transition to renewable energy systems and explicitly mentioning the goal of carbon neutrality by 2050.

The Progressive Party's agenda is ambitious, directly challenging controversial projects like the Yongin semiconductor cluster and advocating for a halt to new nuclear power plants, alongside a push for early decommissioning and legislation to phase out nuclear energy. Their proposals extend to transportation and housing, calling for expanded public transit, a universal basic transport system, and stricter energy efficiency standards for buildings, including zero-energy construction and eco-friendly renovations. To fund these initiatives, they propose a new 'climate co-responsibility tax.'

“

Climate change has become more severe than in past local or general elections, but political parties are not presenting better policies.

The Justice Party, similarly, places climate policy at the forefront, advocating for decentralized energy systems and significant reductions in carbon emissions from buildings and transportation. Their plans include promoting local energy production, expanding energy storage systems, and mandating renewable energy use for data centers. They also propose measures like phasing in free public transportation and redesigning urban spaces to prioritize bicycles and pedestrians, funded through property tax adjustments and an energy transition fund.

“

The fact that climate issues were excluded from the top ten policies of the People Power Party, the Party for National Revolution, and the Social Democratic Party is very worrying.

In contrast, the Democratic Party, while acknowledging climate change, frames its policies through the lens of economic growth and industrial competitiveness. Their pledges include developing renewable energy industrial complexes, attracting high-tech industries to regions with distributed power grids, and fostering the hydrogen industry. They also support the government's 'Energy Highway' project along the west coast, aiming to strengthen the national power grid. This approach, while addressing climate issues, prioritizes economic benefits, a perspective that differs significantly from the more direct environmental focus of the Progressive and Justice parties.

Alarmingly, parties like the People Power Party, the Party for National Revolution, and the Social Democratic Party have entirely omitted climate policies from their top ten pledges. This lack of engagement from major conservative and some smaller parties is deeply concerning, especially given the escalating climate crisis. The evaluation by the civic group 'Climate Politics Wind' ranked the Progressive Party highest, followed by the Justice Party and then the Democratic Party, highlighting a clear divide in climate policy ambition among South Korea's political landscape. This disparity underscores the urgent need for more comprehensive and urgent climate action from all political actors.

“

The Progressive Party and the Justice Party were the only ones to present policies that included implementation measures such as budget and organizational systems; the content from the Democratic Party and the Basic Income Party was insufficient.