Collard's 'Crippling' Ban for Homophobic Slur Reduced on Appeal

In a significant development for the AFL and its player conduct regulations, St Kilda forward Lance Collard has seen his nine-week suspension for a homophobic slur halved to four weeks following a successful appeal. The appeals board, chaired by Will Houghton KC, determined that the initial sanction was "crippling" and disproportionately severe, potentially ending Collard's professional football career. This decision reflects a nuanced approach by the AFL tribunal system, balancing the imperative to eradicate homophobic abuse with the principle of fair and proportionate sentencing.

“

It is to the credit of the AFL and the tribunal that its efforts to eliminate [homophobic abuse] appear to be succeeding.

The appeals board's reasoning highlighted that while the comment made by Collard was indeed "disgraceful" and "clearly homophobic," falling under Rule 2.3(a) for conduct unbecoming, the original penalty was excessive. They considered Collard's age, background, and crucially, the fact that the target of the slur, Darby Hipwell, stated he was not offended. This contextual element played a significant role in reassessing the severity of the sanction.

“

However, that cannot be at the price of imposing what this board considers to be a crippling penalty on the appellant in this case.

St Kilda's defense team strategically referenced past incidents, including a $20,000 fine and suspended ban handed to Alastair Clarkson for a similar offense in 2024, and instances where players like Zak Butters, Dale Thomas, and Dane Rampe received fines rather than suspensions for abusive language. These comparisons aimed to demonstrate the inconsistency in previous sentencing, arguing for a more equitable outcome for Collard.

“

We describe it as crippling because there was evidence before the tribunal in the sanction in both hearings that a penalty of this extent would finish him off as a player of professional football.

From the perspective of ABC Australia, this case underscores the ongoing challenges in enforcing codes of conduct within professional sports. While the AFL's commitment to stamping out discriminatory language is commendable, as noted by the appeals chairman, the tribunal's decisions are continually scrutinized for fairness and consistency. The reduction of Collard's ban, while upholding the condemnation of his language, suggests a move towards sanctions that consider individual circumstances more deeply, a point of discussion that resonates within the Australian sporting landscape where player welfare and career longevity are highly valued.

“

The comment found to have been made by Collard is disgraceful in the view of the appeal board and clearly homophobic.