Common Sense and Panic
Translated from Portuguese, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Global financial markets remained near record levels despite tense weeks preceding a US-Iran agreement, reflecting an expectation of a reasonable outcome.
- The agreement, a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), extends a ceasefire for 60 days and reopens the Strait of Hormuz, crucial for global oil transport.
- Despite the relief, the deal's vulnerabilities include its non-formal status and exclusion of Israel, while global oil stocks remain depleted, posing risks of recession.
Global financial markets largely maintained near-record levels in the tense weeks leading up to a US-Iran agreement, seemingly confident that common sense would prevail. This calm persisted even as tensions escalated, with the Strait of Hormuz, through which 14% of global oil consumption transits, becoming a focal point of potential conflict.
Common sense is the most well-distributed thing in the world
The agreement, signed Wednesday, extends a ceasefire for 60 days and reopens the Strait of Hormuz. However, the deal is characterized as a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), not a formal accord, and notably excludes Israel, despite demands for it to suspend attacks in southern Lebanon. President Trump himself acknowledged the provisional nature of the deal, tweeting, "No, it is not definitive, it is just an MoU," and indicating that attacks could resume.
a silent panic has been setting in
Despite these vulnerabilities, the announcement brought significant relief. The prospect of the conflict extending for several more weeks was dire, with global oil stocks already down 400 million barrels since the crisis began and continuing to deplete at a rate of 6 million barrels per day. Such a critical level could have triggered a global recession, prompting Trump to welcome the deal with the phrase "Let the oil flow!"
I am in a bit of panic
The market's apparent indifference to the risks was noted, contrasting with the "silent panic" described by a chief commodities strategist at a major American bank and admitted by Nobel laureate economist Paul Krugman. The risks, the article suggests, stem not from a lack of reasons for an agreement but from the contenders' inability to recognize them. Both Iran, needing to re-establish oil export revenues amid an economy battered by sanctions, and the U.S., seeking a realistic exit from an impasse after initially demanding unconditional surrender from Tehran, had strong incentives to reach a deal.
No, it is not definitive, it is just an MoU
Originally published by Folha de S.Paulo in Portuguese. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.