Commonwealth's $2 billion PFAS lawsuit against 3M 'daunting', judge says

A Federal Court judge has described the Commonwealth of Australia's $2 billion lawsuit against chemical manufacturer 3M over PFAS contamination at defense bases as "daunting."

“

I have never seen a claim like this … and to characterise it as daunting would be an understatement, daunting for everybody.

During the first case management hearing in Federal Court, both parties acknowledged the complexity of the Australian government's claim. A 1,600-page statement of claim details alleged soil and water contamination at 28 defense bases across Australia, stemming from the use of firefighting foam containing PFAS chemicals. Justice Catherine Button remarked that the claim was so extensive, "to characterise it as daunting would be an understatement, daunting for everybody."

“

we will defend ourselves against these claims through legal process

3M, which has manufactured PFAS chemicals since the 1950s, faces allegations of withholding environmental laboratory test results that indicated significant adverse effects from its PFAS products. The company stated it "will defend ourselves against these claims through legal process." Despite 3M ceasing the sale of the products in Australia two decades ago, the Department of Defence continued to use them.

“

This matter can't run on a traditional set of train tracks otherwise we'll never get there.

To expedite the process, counsel for the Commonwealth suggested that 3M plead to claims related to six selected defense sites by year-end. These sites represent a mix of environmental issues, including stagnant contamination plumes, exceeding safe drinking water thresholds, and ongoing PFAS migration. Justice Button agreed, noting that a traditional approach would lead to an extremely lengthy trial, stating, "We'll all be retired, if not dead, by the time it comes to trial."

“

We'll all be retired, if not dead, by the time it comes to trial