DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡จ Ecuador /Technology

Company Pays $2,000 for One Month of Erotic AI Testing

From El Comercio · () Spanish

Translated from Spanish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Sources not specified Context piece
  • A company, Joi AI, paid 10 individuals $2,000 each to test erotic artificial intelligence companions for a month.
  • The study aimed to assess if daily AI-assisted masturbation reduces stress and improves concentration.
  • Preliminary results suggest a decrease in stress and an increase in concentration, though experts question the scientific validity due to reliance on self-reported data.

The company Joi AI has recruited 10 individuals to participate in a month-long experiment, paying each $2,000 to test erotic artificial intelligence companions. The study's primary goal is to evaluate the impact of daily AI-assisted masturbation on participants' stress levels and concentration, exploring whether this digital interaction can function as a wellness ritual.

From over 150,000 applicants, the selected participants engaged in daily interactions via chats and video calls with digital characters designed for adult engagement over 28 days. According to Wired, participants were required to log their energy levels, mood, and concentration before and after each session.

The tool seeks to combat the taboo surrounding self-pleasure and address male loneliness.

โ€” Julie LevinJoi AI's Director of Communications, explaining the company's goals for its AI companions.

Initial findings from an analysis of 134 session reports indicate a potential 25% reduction in stress levels and a 17% increase in concentration among participants. Joi AI also reported a 44% decrease in cravings for nicotine, alcohol, and junk food. Julie Levin, Joi AI's Director of Communications, stated the tool aims to destigmatize self-pleasure and address male loneliness.

However, independent experts have raised concerns about the study's conclusions, citing a lack of objective scientific evidence. Neuroscientist Nicole Prause noted that the data relies solely on participants' self-assessments, making it difficult to verify any direct impact on addiction reduction. The implementation and effects of such technologies on human relationships remain a subject of ongoing scientific debate.

The data is based solely on participants' self-evaluations, which makes it impossible to verify a direct impact on reducing addictions.

โ€” Nicole PrauseA neuroscientist expressing skepticism about the study's findings due to reliance on self-reported data.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by El Comercio in Spanish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.