DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Indonesia /Elections & Politics

Constitutional Court Affirms Direct Regional Elections by the People

From Tempo · () Indonesian

Translated from Indonesian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Sources not specified Outcome reported
  • The Constitutional Court of Indonesia affirmed that regional head elections (Pilkada) must be conducted directly by the people.
  • The court rejected a request to review the phrase "directly and democratically" in the law governing these elections.
  • This decision upholds the principle of popular sovereignty in local leadership selection.

Indonesia's Constitutional Court has firmly upheld the principle that regional head elections, known as Pilkada, must remain a direct vote by the people. In a ruling on Monday, June 29, 2026, the court rejected a legal challenge seeking to reinterpret the existing law governing the selection of governors, regents, and mayors.

The case, numbered 195/PUU-XXIV/2026, specifically addressed the phrase "directly and democratically" within the relevant legislation. Chief Justice Suhartoyo stated that the court's decision was guided by a series of previous rulings that consistently affirmed the necessity of direct popular elections for regional leaders.

Based on the legal considerations of those decisions, the mechanism for electing regional heads is currently carried out directly by the people.

โ€” SuhartoyoChief Justice Suhartoyo explained the court's reasoning, referencing previous rulings that support direct elections.

This ruling effectively dismisses a petition filed by four university students who expressed concerns that the phrase "democratically" could be exploited to revive an indirect election system through regional legislative bodies. The students feared this could undermine the principle of popular sovereignty and infringe upon their political rights.

The Constitutional Court's decision reinforces the existing electoral framework, ensuring that the direct election of regional heads remains the standard practice, consistent with prior jurisprudence. The court found that the petitioners had not sufficiently demonstrated actual or potential harm to their constitutional rights.

Based on the legal considerations of those decisions, the mechanism for electing regional heads is currently carried out directly by the people.

โ€” SuhartoyoChief Justice Suhartoyo reiterated the court's stance on direct elections for regional heads.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Tempo in Indonesian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.