DistantNews
Support us
Court to rule in Prince Harry, Daily Mail privacy case
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช Ireland /Crime & Justice

Court to rule in Prince Harry, Daily Mail privacy case

From RTร‰ News · () English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Under investigation
  • Prince Harry is awaiting a High Court judgment in his privacy case against the Daily Mail's publisher.
  • He alleges unlawful information gathering, including voicemail interception and "blagging."
  • The publisher, Associated Newspapers Limited, denies the claims and argues the cases were filed too late.

Prince Harry is set to learn the outcome of his High Court privacy case against Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL), the publisher of the Daily Mail. The Duke of Sussex, who now resides in the U.S., returned to London ahead of the judgment, which is scheduled to be delivered this afternoon.

knowingly false

โ€” Prince HarryDescribing information added to stories to conceal unlawful methods used against him.

The case, which went to trial earlier this year over 11 weeks, centers on allegations of unlawful information gathering. Harry and a group of other high-profile individuals, including Elton John and David Furnish, claim that private investigators, freelance journalists, and ANL staff engaged in practices such as voicemail interception, landline tapping, and obtaining information through deception, commonly known as "blagging."

the institution I was in

โ€” Prince HarryExplaining why he did not complain about certain articles at the time they were published.

ANL has strongly denied these accusations, asserting a "complete defence to all parts of the claims on the merits." The publisher also contends that the legal actions were initiated beyond the statutory time limits. Judge Mr Justice Nicklin will issue a written ruling on the case via email at 2 PM.

has established a complete defence to all parts of the claims on the merits

โ€” Associated Newspapers LimitedStating their defense against the allegations of unlawful information gathering.

During the trial, numerous individuals provided evidence, including Prince Harry himself. In his cross-examination in January, Harry suggested that he could not raise complaints about some of the 14 articles central to his case at the time due to "the institution I was in." He also stated in written evidence that "knowingly false" information was deliberately added to stories to mislead him and conceal the use of unlawful methods.

compelling account of a pattern of legitimate sourcing of articles

โ€” Associated Newspapers LimitedDescribing their defense strategy, which includes reliance on various sources.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by RTร‰ News. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.