DistantNews
Support us
Court upholds 5-year ban for bar exam phone use
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea /Crime & Justice

Court upholds 5-year ban for bar exam phone use

From Dong-A Ilbo · () Korean

Translated from Korean, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Sources not specified Outcome reported
  • A law school student who faced a 5-year ban from the bar exam for using a mobile phone has lost a lawsuit seeking to overturn the decision.
  • The court found the student's actions, including refusing to submit the phone and rejecting a forensic examination, were unfavorable.
  • The court upheld the ban, citing the need for high ethical standards in the legal profession and the difficulty of preventing exam misconduct.

A law school student's attempt to overturn a five-year ban from the bar exam has failed after a court ruled against them. The student was sanctioned for allegedly using a mobile phone during the exam, a serious offense in the rigorous legal qualification process.

The Seoul Administrative Court rejected the student's lawsuit seeking to cancel the disciplinary action imposed by the Ministry of Justice. The student argued they only possessed the phone and did not use it for illicit purposes, and that the five-year suspension was excessively harsh. The ban means the student can no longer take the exam, as candidates are limited to five attempts within five years of obtaining their law school degree.

During the exam, the student reportedly concealed the phone under their exam paper and repeatedly checked it. When a proctor discovered this and demanded the phone's submission, the student refused for several minutes, demanding a warrant. This refusal, along with a subsequent rejection of the Ministry of Justice's request for a forensic examination of the device, significantly impacted the court's decision.

The court found the student's explanation for wrapping the phone in white paper and setting the screen to a blank white โ€“ claiming it was for good luck โ€“ to be an "unreasonable explanation." The court also noted the student's behavior was inconsistent with common sense, as someone claiming innocence would typically cooperate immediately to prove they did not use the phone for cheating.

In its ruling, the court emphasized the high ethical standards required of lawyers and the increasing difficulty of detecting exam misconduct due to technological advancements. The court concluded that the Ministry of Justice did not overstep its discretionary powers in imposing the five-year ban, deeming it a justifiable measure to maintain the integrity of the bar examination.

DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Dong-A Ilbo in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.