Courts must not rely solely on nikahnama in marriage disputes: LHC

The Lahore High Court has issued a significant ruling stating that courts must look beyond marriage certificates like the nikahnama when adjudicating disputes over alleged love marriages, abductions, or forced unions. The court emphasized that the entire context surrounding a marriage is crucial, particularly when one party claims coercion.

In a judgment authored by Justice Anwaar Hussain, the LHC dismissed a petition filed by Muhammad Jamil. Jamil was challenging an appellate court's decision that favored a woman who alleged she had been abducted and forced into marriage without her consent. The woman had sought a decree of jactitation of marriage, essentially nullifying the union.

“

What is the correct approach for a court while appreciating evidence in cases where an alleged love marriage is relied upon by one party and allegations of abduction, coercion or forced marriage are raised by the other?

The core legal question, as framed by the judge, was how courts should evaluate evidence when a consensual relationship is claimed by one side and abduction or forced marriage is alleged by the other. While the trial court had initially dismissed the woman's suit, relying on the nikahnama and the fact that the parties belonged to the same caste, the appellate court overturned this. It found that the marriage was not proven to be based on the woman's free and voluntary consent.

Justice Hussain's judgment underscored that while documents like a registered nikahnama or even a harassment petition might initially support a marriage claim, they are not definitive proof when the marriage's foundation, free consent, is contested. The judge noted a lack of convincing evidence explaining the origin of the relationship between the parties, who lived over 100 kilometers apart and were essentially strangers despite belonging to the same caste. The court stressed the obligation to investigate how such relationships begin and lead to marriage, especially when consent is questioned.

“

The question whether consent was genuine, voluntary and free from any coercion must be examined in the light of the entire attending circumstances before and after the solemnisation of the purported nikah.