CPBL: Dragons' Hou Jin's first inning control falters, narrowly misses ignominious record
Translated from Chinese, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Taiwanese baseball pitcher Hou Jin struggled with control in the first inning against the CTBC Brothers, issuing five walks.
- He allowed four runs in that inning, narrowly missing a league record for most walks in a single inning.
- Hou Jin's career ERA against the Brothers is 2.62, but his performance on this day was significantly affected by his control issues.
Taiwanese baseball's Wei Chuan Dragons' foreign pitcher Hou Jin experienced a difficult start to his game against the CTBC Brothers on July 21, 2026. Pitching at home in Taichung, Hou Jin, who has a respectable career ERA of 2.62 against the Brothers, lost control in the very first inning. He issued a total of five walks, bringing him just one walk shy of the league's single-inning record.
The control issues began after the first batter, Zhang Renwei, singled, and Yue Zhenghua successfully bunted. Hou Jin then struck out Wang Weichen for two outs. However, the situation unraveled as he proceeded to walk four consecutive batters: Zhan Zixian, Zeng Songen, Jiang Kunyu, and Huang Weisheng. This was followed by another walk to Zhang Shilun. During this tumultuous inning, catcher Gao Yujie managed to hit a single, which, combined with a fielding error by the Dragons, resulted in two runs scoring. In total, Hou Jin allowed four runs in the first inning due to his control problems.
The league record for most walks in a single inning is six, set by Huang Guangqi of the Uni-President Lions in 1993. Hou Jin's five walks place him second on that all-time list, tied with several other pitchers, and marks a personal high for him in a single inning. The game's outcome and further details of Hou Jin's performance were not immediately available.
Originally published by Liberty Times in Chinese. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.