Cyclist Stabbed by Van Driver in Paris; Hearing Adjourned

A court hearing for a van driver who allegedly stabbed a cyclist in Paris this week has been adjourned until November 4. The accused, a 39-year-old Egyptian national, was initially set to face immediate trial for assault with a weapon causing less than eight days of total work incapacity (ITT).

“

This case does not correspond to what has been presented by the media in recent days. It is in no way a case of a motorist who gratuitously attacked a cyclist but an altercation between two men who exchanged blows alternately.

The adjournment came at the request of the driver's lawyer, who argued for the cyclist to also be summoned to court, citing "reciprocal violence." The court granted this request, rescheduling the hearing for November 4. In the interim, the driver has been released under judicial supervision, with conditions including no contact with the cyclist and mandatory psychological treatment.

Reports indicate the altercation began Tuesday when the driver parked his van on a bike lane in the 9th arrondissement. According to investigation details, an initial blow was struck by the driver. However, the cyclist then reportedly struck the driver through the van's window. The driver subsequently produced a knife and stabbed the cyclist in the neck. The cyclist, a 24-year-old Algerian national in France illegally and known to police for theft, was granted six days of ITT.

“

Only my client was initially prosecuted, but the prosecution, at today's hearing, recognized that we were right to request an adjournment (...) to allow us to also have the cyclist summoned (...) so that he too answers for the violence committed against my client.

The driver, who claimed he acted out of fear, has no prior criminal record and is reportedly well-integrated. He sustained two days of ITT from the incident. He initially fled the scene but was apprehended hours later. The driver's lawyer, Adrien Robin, emphasized that the case is not one of a driver gratuitously attacking a cyclist, but rather a mutual altercation. He stressed the importance of awaiting investigation conclusions and court decisions before condemning an individual.

“

This case demonstrates that one should not deliver a person to popular vindication without waiting for the conclusions of an investigation and the decision of a court.