DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Denmark /Crime & Justice

Danish recruitment firm accused of obstructing inspection by deleting emails

From Berlingske · () Danish

Translated from Danish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Official statement Under investigation
  • A Danish recruitment agency, JobTeam, is accused of violating competition law by obstructing an unannounced inspection.
  • An employee deleted approximately 5,000 email

A Danish recruitment agency faces accusations of violating competition law after an employee systematically deleted a large volume of emails during an unannounced inspection. JobTeam, a nationwide recruitment and staffing firm, is under scrutiny by the Competition and Consumer Authority for obstructing the official visit.

Control inspections are crucial for the authority to enforce the law. This is often where we find the conclusive evidence of a violation of competition rules.

โ€” Stefan KobbernagelOffice chief at the Competition and Consumer Authority, explaining the importance of inspections.

The authority reported that the employee deleted around 5,000 "elements," primarily emails, from the company's IT system. While the content of the deleted messages and the specific reason for the attempted concealment remain undisclosed, the authority stated the deletion appeared methodical and targeted. Fortunately, investigators were able to recover all the deleted material.

Stefan Kobbernagel, office chief at the Competition and Consumer Authority, emphasized the critical role of control inspections in enforcing the law. "This is often where we find the conclusive evidence of a violation of competition rules," he stated. "Companies have a duty to cooperate with us during a control inspection, and it is forbidden to delete material while the investigation is ongoing."

Companies have a duty to cooperate with us during a control inspection, and it is forbidden to delete material while the investigation is ongoing.

โ€” Stefan KobbernagelOffice chief at the Competition and Consumer Authority, detailing company obligations during inspections.

The inspection was initially prompted by suspicions that the competition law had been previously breached in another, unspecified case. A decision is still pending in that matter. The authority can either open a new case against a company or close the matter with a warning, depending on the circumstances. The company is expected to face a fine, though the exact amount will depend on the outcome of any potential appeal.

Deletion of material weakens our ability to enforce competition rules, and it can result in a fine.

โ€” Stefan KobbernagelOffice chief at the Competition and Consumer Authority, outlining the consequences of obstructing inspections.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Berlingske in Danish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.