Demonizing welfare recipients and refusing to accept the loss of power
Translated from Slovenian and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.
At a glance
- Levica parliamentary leader Asta Vrečko and New Slovenia leader Janez Žakelj clashed over proposed consultative referendums in the Moč politike podcast.
- Vrečko described the referendums as a distraction and an attack on minorities, while Žakelj defended them as a legitimate way to ask voters about welfare, RTV and foreigners’ voting rights.
- The debate expanded to social policy, public finances, public broadcasting, an omnibus law, investigative commissions and Israel.
Asta Vrečko and Janez Žakelj turned a debate over proposed consultative referendums into a broader confrontation over Slovenia’s social state, public finances and public broadcaster RTV.
Vrečko, the parliamentary group leader of Levica, argued that the referendums were designed to divert attention and target minorities. Žakelj, who leads the New Slovenia parliamentary group, defended them as legitimate questions for citizens, including issues involving welfare, RTV and the voting rights of foreign nationals.
The exchange also focused on the treatment of people receiving social assistance. Levica warned against demonizing welfare recipients and against politicizing RTV. NSi, by contrast, stressed responsibility toward taxpayers and said public media should be “in the service of the people, not politics”.
The discussion became sharper as the guests moved to an omnibus law, investigative commissions and disagreements over Israel. The podcast presented the clash as a meeting of two opposing views of social policy, public institutions and the role of referendums in political conflict.
in the service of the people, not politics
Originally published by Delo in Slovenian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.