DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Argentina /Culture & Society

DHS directs ICE lawyers to seek early dismissal of some asylum cases

From La Naciรณn · () Spanish

Translated from Spanish and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.

At a glance

Explainer Named sources New plan
  • A new DHS directive tells ICE attorneys to seek early dismissal of asylum cases they believe fail to meet legal requirements at the filing stage.
  • Immigration judges, not ICE, will decide whether to grant the motions, and applicants can oppose them and seek a full merits hearing.
  • The policy forms part of the Trump administrationโ€™s effort to reduce immigration-court backlogs and pursue cases it considers fraudulent.

A new Department of Homeland Security directive instructs Immigration and Customs Enforcement lawyers to ask immigration judges to close some asylum cases before they reach a full merits hearing.

The directive took immediate effect and applies to prosecutors in ICEโ€™s Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, according to information obtained by Fox News. Lawyers must file motions to pretermit cases when they believe an asylum application fails to meet the legal requirements from the outset.

A motion to pretermit allows the government to argue that a case has legal deficiencies that can be decided without a full hearing. ICE cannot close the cases on its own. The immigration judge must decide whether to accept or reject the governmentโ€™s motion.

Applicants retain the right to defend their claims. If ICE files a motion, the migrant can respond and argue that the case should continue to a merits hearing. The policy is intended to reduce the backlog in immigration courts and focus resources on applications that meet legal requirements.

The directive follows other DHS measures targeting applications the government considers fraudulent. A May directive expanded ICE lawyersโ€™ ability to invoke immigration-fraud provisions and seek sanctions against legal representatives accused of submitting false information. The government has sought a $470,584 penalty against Suraj Raj Singh, accusing him of using identical or similar persecution narratives in 54 cases and filing 118 documents it considered false. A separate action against lawyer Vinod Doddamani resulted in sanctions of $255,232.

About this summary

Originally published by La Naciรณn in Spanish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.