DistantNews
Support us
Drunk Driver Who Severed Pedestrian's Body Appeals Sentence in Singapore
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Singapore /Crime & Justice

Drunk Driver Who Severed Pedestrian's Body Appeals Sentence in Singapore

From CNA · () English

Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources In the courts
  • A drunk driver who caused a fatal accident, severing a pedestrian's body, is appealing for a reduced sentence in Singapore.
  • Prosecutors are seeking an increased jail term of over 12 years, while the defense argues for a sentence between six and eight years.
  • The driver, a Singapore permanent resident, had his two young children in the car during the incident, which occurred at high speed on a road with a lower speed limit.

A Singapore permanent resident, who was driving drunk with his two young children in the car, has appealed for a lesser jail sentence after causing a fatal accident that severed a pedestrian's body. The 46-year-old man, who pleaded guilty to dangerous driving causing death and repeat drink driving, is currently serving an 11-year sentence. His lawyers are seeking a reduction to between six years and four months, and eight years' jail.

Prosecutors, however, are pushing for an extended sentence of 12 years and nine months, while maintaining the existing S$12,000 fine and 15-year driving ban. The court heard that on April 23, 2023, the man was driving home from a child's birthday party. He failed to see a 64-year-old retiree crossing the road and struck the pedestrian at a speed between 111kmh and 122kmh, significantly exceeding the 70kmh limit.

The impact was so severe that the victim's body was severed into three parts, with the torso and head entering the offender's car. The collision also shattered the windscreen of the man's BMW M3 Coupe and injured his two children, who were in booster seats in the back. The court was informed that the man had been lethargic due to staying up tending to his newborn child and had taken an antihistamine, though he claimed it had no effect that morning.

The appeal before Justice Christopher Tan focused significantly on a 30 percent sentencing discount granted by the lower court judge. This discount is typically given for early guilty pleas under Stage 1 guidelines. However, prosecutors argued this discount was given in error, as the offender only indicated his intention to plead guilty within Stage 2 of the guidelines. The defense team is arguing for the discount to stand.

DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by CNA in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.