Effect of Oral Retraction of Confessional Statement during Trial
Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- The Supreme Court of Nigeria is hearing an appeal against a death sentence for armed robbery and conspiracy.
- The appellant was convicted based on eyewitness testimony and a confessional statement, but argues he was not sufficiently identified.
- The court will determine if the Court of Appeal was correct to uphold the conviction and sentence.
The Supreme Court of Nigeria, sitting in Abuja, is reviewing a death sentence handed down to Ramoni Animashaun for conspiracy and armed robbery. The appellant was convicted by the High Court of Ogun State and later affirmed by the Court of Appeal, Ibadan Division. The case hinges on the appellant's contention that the prosecution failed to sufficiently link him to the crime.
At the trial, the prosecution presented four witnesses, including the victim, Raheem Lateef (PW1), and evidence such as a locally made pistol and cartridge. The trial court found the appellant guilty on both counts and imposed the death penalty on May 24, 2017. The conviction was subsequently upheld by the Court of Appeal on June 25, 2020.
In his appeal to the Supreme Court, the appellant argues that the evidence presented was insufficient for conviction. He specifically challenges the reliance on the eyewitness testimony of PW1 and his alleged confessional statement. The core of his argument is that his identity as one of the perpetrators was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt, questioning whether the lower courts were right to affirm his conviction and sentence.
Originally published by ThisDay. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.