DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Nigeria /Crime & Justice

El-Rufai demands family access, N10bn damages from ICPC

From The Punch · () English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources In the courts
  • Former Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai is suing the ICPC for N10 billion, alleging denial of access to his wife and son while in custody.
  • El-Rufai claims the ICPC's refusal to allow family visits, including for food and medication, violates his constitutional rights.
  • The lawsuit seeks declarations that his fundamental rights are enforceable and an order for unhindered family access during detention.

Nasir El-Rufai, the former governor of Kaduna State, has initiated a N10 billion fundamental rights lawsuit against the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC). El-Rufai alleges that the commission has denied him access to his wife and son while he is in custody, constituting a violation of his constitutional rights.

the respondentsโ€™ continued denial of family access without lawful authority is unconstitutional, illegal, null and void.

โ€” Nasir El-RufaiEl-Rufai's legal team's argument in the lawsuit.

The suit, filed at the Federal High Court in Abuja, names the ICPC chairman and the Attorney-General of the Federation as defendants. El-Rufai's legal team argues that the repeated refusal to allow family members to visit, particularly to provide food and medication, is unlawful and breaches his rights under the Nigerian Constitution and the African Charter on Human and Peoplesโ€™ Rights. The former governor also alleges that ICPC officers intimidated his wife and son during an attempted visit.

This action has subjected the applicant to humiliation, emotional trauma, anxiety and psychological distress.

โ€” Nasir El-RufaiEl-Rufai's alleged experience due to the denial of family access.

El-Rufai is seeking multiple reliefs from the court. These include declarations that his fundamental rights remain enforceable despite his detention and an order compelling the respondents to grant him reasonable and unhindered access to his family and legal counsel. He contends that the alleged denial of access has subjected him to humiliation, emotional trauma, and psychological distress, constituting an unjustifiable interference with his dignity and family life.

The respondentsโ€™ conduct amounts to an unjustifiable interference with the applicantโ€™s dignity and family life and is therefore unconstitutional.

โ€” Nasir El-RufaiEl-Rufai's legal team's characterization of the ICPC's actions.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by The Punch. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.