Election compasses: A deciding factor or just a guide for Swedish voters?
Translated from Swedish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Digital election compasses have become a popular tool for voters in Sweden, with 63% using them in the 2022 election.
- While highly valued, research indicates it's difficult to isolate the compasses' direct impact on voting behavior, as users did not vote significantly differently from non-users.
- First-time voters reported the compasses played a larger role in their decisions, suggesting they are particularly influential for younger, less politically knowledgeable individuals.
Digital election compasses have surged in popularity in Sweden, becoming a significant source of information for voters navigating complex political landscapes. A 2022 study revealed that 63% of voters used at least one party test, with half considering them an important tool for the upcoming election, second only to televised party leader debates.
It is not so strange, as we know that young people are more uncertain about how to vote and have lower political knowledge.
Despite their high perceived value, pinpointing the exact influence of these digital tools on actual voting decisions remains a challenge for researchers. A study by the University of Gothenburg's Election Research Program found that users of election compasses did not vote significantly differently from those who abstained from using them in the 2022 election. This suggests that the compasses are difficult to isolate from the broader information flow during an election campaign.
However, the impact appears more pronounced among first-time voters. A significant 72% of this group reported that the election compass played a certain or major role in their voting choices. This is attributed to younger voters often being more uncertain and possessing lower levels of political knowledge, making them more receptive to guidance.
It can be quite decisive. It can have a big impact on the election outcome when elections are very close.
While a majority of all voters (56%) stated the tests had no impact, 38% felt they played a certain role, and 6% said it was a major one. Political scientists note that even this small percentage can be decisive in closely contested elections. Furthermore, election compasses are seen as valuable for indirectly boosting political interest and knowledge, focusing voters on substantive issues, which is the core of democratic elections.
It is important to highlight the democratic value of the compasses. They increase interest, they increase knowledge among voters and that is what the election should be about, namely the substantive issues.
Originally published by Svenska Dagbladet in Swedish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.