Elon Musk's DOGE savings claims difficult to verify, fall short of promises
Translated from Spanish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) reported that Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has not met its promised $2 trillion in government spending cuts.
- DOGE claims to have saved $215 billion, but the GAO found its methodologies for calculating these savings are not transparent and include pre-existing cuts.
- The GAO could not verify $110 billion in claimed savings from contract modifications and found that some claimed savings were significantly lower than reported.
Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has fallen far short of its ambitious promise to cut $2 trillion from U.S. government spending and establish itself as the federal government's most transparent organization. An audit by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) reveals significant discrepancies and a lack of transparency in DOGE's reported savings.
DOGE's "Wall of Receipts" website claims total savings of $215 billion through workforce reductions and cuts to federal contracts, grants, and leases. However, the GAO report indicates that this figure is considerably lower than Musk's initial pledge. Furthermore, DOGE's calculations incorporate spending reductions that were already in progress before the department's creation, inflating the perceived impact of its actions.
The GAO specifically examined $110 billion in claimed savings from modifications to contracts, grants, and leases but was unable to verify the methodologies used. The report states that DOGE did not employ the claimed methods for calculating most of its reported contract savings. For grants, insufficient information was provided to verify 96% of the reported savings, and lease contract savings lacked clear explanations.
An example highlighted by the GAO involves lease contracts: 108 of the 264 leases DOGE sought to terminate were already in the process of being ended when the department was established. This means DOGE's claimed savings of $53.5 million in this category are actually $15.3 million lower. Similar discrepancies were found in analyses of Department of Defense contracts, where savings were either non-existent, exaggerated, or based on funds that might never have been disbursed.
Originally published by El Paรญs in Spanish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.