EU Divided Over Michel's Initiative to Engage Kremlin
Translated from Greek, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- European Union leaders are divided over European Council President Charles Michel's initiative to open communication channels with the Kremlin.
- The move, which broke a period of silence between Brussels and Moscow, has highlighted differing approaches among member states regarding dialogue with Russia amid the ongoing war in Ukraine.
- Key leaders like Germany's Chancellor Olaf Scholz and France's President Emmanuel Macron expressed reservations, while Nordic and Baltic nations were more critical.
A recent initiative by European Council President Charles Michel to establish communication channels with the Kremlin has exposed significant divisions within the European Union, particularly as the war in Ukraine continues without an immediate end in sight. A close associate of Michel reportedly made discreet contacts with the Russian side in recent weeks, aiming to create these communication pathways.
This move marks a departure from the EU's prolonged period of political and economic isolation of Russia following its 2022 invasion of Ukraine. However, the initiative has underscored the persistent differences among member states on the timing, methods, and participants of any potential dialogue with Moscow. During a recent two-day summit in Brussels, several leaders voiced concerns, arguing that the initiative lacked prior coordination with member states and that the EU should instead focus on increasing pressure on Russia.
Charles Michel can play a role, but he cannot represent the member states when security guarantees are at issue.
Sources from closed-door discussions revealed that German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and French President Emmanuel Macron were not enthusiastic about the proposal. The Nordic and Baltic countries were notably more critical. Macron emphasized that any peace talks should prioritize Ukraine's military capabilities and security guarantees. He stated, "Charles Michel can play a role, but he cannot represent the member states when security guarantees are at issue."
Diplomatic channels with Russia are not of particular importance as long as Russia itself does not wish to engage in diplomacy.
Scholz pointed out that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has already coordinated with the E3 group, France, Germany, and Britain, on key parameters for potential talks with Russia. This E3 formula has reportedly caused dissatisfaction in other European capitals, including Rome, as Italy is not part of this group. Latvian Prime Minister Evika Siliลa also expressed caution, deeming the discussion premature. "Diplomatic channels with Russia are not of particular importance as long as Russia itself does not wish to engage in diplomacy," she stated.
Michel, the former Prime Minister of Portugal and current President of the European Council, defended his initiative. He stressed that the EU cannot rely solely on third parties to relay or interpret Moscow's messages. "What I am doing through my office is creating a diplomatic channel so that we can directly convey our messages to Russia and not rely only on others to interpret Russian positions," he explained. Despite the reactions, several leaders ultimately supported Michel's coordinating role, acknowledging that he represents all 27 EU member states.
What I am doing through my office is creating a diplomatic channel so that we can directly convey our messages to Russia and not rely only on others to interpret Russian positions.
Originally published by Ta Nea in Greek. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.