Ex-Defense Minister Fedorov Explains Dismissal Amidst Reform Resistance

Former Ukrainian Defense Minister Mykhailo Fedorov suggests his recent dismissal stemmed from opposition to his reform efforts within the ministry, rather than a routine government reshuffle. Fedorov indicated that his overhaul of internal processes, including procurement and tenders, generated significant discontent among various groups.

“

Half an hour or an hour before the faction meeting, I was told Klymenko was going to be nominated.

Fedorov stated that pressure mounted around the Defense Ministry and himself starting in early April, involving law enforcement agencies and negative media narratives. He believes these actions were orchestrated by individuals and groups who stood to lose from the transparency and rule changes he was implementing in the defense sector. Fedorov also noted that many major weapons manufacturers, potentially linked to influential figures, might resist a transparent arms procurement market.

“

I'd rather not speculate about that or recount my conversations with the president. There was nothing in those discussions that hadn't already been said publicly. There's been a lot of talk about a conflict, but I actually think the reasons lay elsewhere.

He declined other positions offered by President Zelenskyy, explaining that he saw no value in roles that would not grant him substantial authority to impact the war's direction. Fedorov emphasized that current debates should focus on strategy for victory, not on personalities.

“

The changes we were making to procurement, tenders, and the overall way these processes are organised made a lot of people very unhappy. They began constantly trying to exert influence and spread negative narratives, not only around the president but across the wider media space.

In an interview with Ukrainska Pravda, Fedorov detailed how he learned of his dismissal and discussed his conflicts with the General Staff, procurement pressures, and the reasons behind the resistance to his reforms. He also touched upon his team's war plan, the future of mobilization reform, and his post-ministry role.

“

I think that's entirely plausible. A great many people in this country have ties to defence businesses.