DistantNews
Support us
Ex-Justice Minister Denies Receiving Orders from Chun in First Appeal Hearing
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea /Elections & Politics

Ex-Justice Minister Denies Receiving Orders from Chun in First Appeal Hearing

From Dong-A Ilbo · () Korean

Translated from Korean, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Sources not specified In the courts
  • Former Justice Minister Park Sung-jae, sentenced to 25 years for alleged involvement in a 1979 martial law rebellion, denied receiving any orders from former President Chun Doo-hwan during his first appellate trial.
  • Park's defense argued that the lower court's decision relied on speculation and requested an acquittal.
  • The defense criticized the prosecution's reliance on inferences, comparing it to outdated logic.

Former Justice Minister Park Sung-jae, who received a 25-year sentence in his first trial for allegedly participating in a rebellion during a 1979 martial law period, has denied receiving any directives from former President Chun Doo-hwan. Appearing at his first appellate hearing, Park's defense team argued that the initial verdict was based on conjecture and urged the court to acquit him. The defense specifically challenged the prosecution's extensive use of inferences, which they claimed amounted to approximately 50 instances in the original ruling. They likened this reasoning to outdated methods, asserting that Park merely reviewed the Ministry of Justice's standard duties during the martial law period and did not receive specific instructions from the president. The prosecution, however, maintains that Park was involved in a key role within the rebellion.

I did not receive any operational instructions from President Chun Doo-hwan.

โ€” Park Sung-jaePark Sung-jae's statement during his first appellate trial, denying directives from the former president.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Dong-A Ilbo in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.