Experts Criticize State Plan to Certify Indigenous Crafts
Translated from Spanish and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.
At a glance
- Specialists discussed a proposed General Law on the Rights of Indigenous and Afro-Mexican Peoples, which remains under consultation.
- Daniela Lucio criticized provisions that would place an artisan royalty fund and craft certifications under government control.
- Anthropologist Giovanna Gasparello said the proposalโs language gives the state broad powers over Indigenous peoples despite its stated support for self-determination and autonomy.
A proposed Mexican law intended to recognize the rights of Indigenous and Afro-Mexican peoples has drawn criticism over the power it would give the state to define and regulate Indigenous crafts and communities.
The issue arose during a lengthy discussion of the initiative at the National Institute of Anthropology and History, or INAH. The session, titled โIndigenous Rights or Republic of Indians?โ, was organized by researcher Bolfy Cottom at INAHโs Directorate of Historical Studies. Daniela Lucio, a specialist from the Faculty of Law, addressed the proposalโs treatment of intellectual property linked to Indigenous artisans.
Is this law a recognition or is it really an attempt to regulate certain things that go off on a tangent? In the end, the state will decide the value, not the consultations, not the peoples.
Lucio said the bill would create a royalty fund from craft sales, but the government, rather than the artisans, would administer the money. She also criticized a provision under which the state would certify whether a product qualifies as a craft, determine its category and assign its value. โIs this law a recognition or is it really an attempt to regulate certain things that go off on a tangent? In the end, the state will decide the value, not the consultations, not the peoples,โ she said.
The initiative is riddled with โthe state may, the state may,โ so it becomes unclear whether these are rights or obligations.
Anthropologist Giovanna Gasparello said the proposal contains more than 450 articles, most of which she described as โfluff.โ She argued that it would give the state authority over the administration of Indigenous peoples. โThe initiative is riddled with โthe state may, the state may,โ so it becomes unclear whether these are rights or obligations,โ she said.
Gasparello also pointed to a contradiction between the billโs promise to promote the free determination and autonomy of Indigenous peoples and its plan for the government to decide which communities qualify. A government ruling would place them in a National Catalogue of Indigenous Peoples. โA catalogue is an extremely colonial tool,โ she said. The discussion also noted that the bill would recognize the Bastรณn de Mando, an ancestral Indigenous practice now included in political events, a practice the article says began with Andrรฉs Manuel Lรณpez Obrador and continues under Claudia Sheinbaum.
A catalogue is an extremely colonial tool.
Originally published by El Universal in Spanish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.