DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Mexico /Elections & Politics

Experts Criticize State Plan to Certify Indigenous Crafts

From El Universal · () Spanish

Translated from Spanish and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.

At a glance

News Named sources Ongoing story
  • Specialists discussed a proposed General Law on the Rights of Indigenous and Afro-Mexican Peoples, which remains under consultation.
  • Daniela Lucio criticized provisions that would place an artisan royalty fund and craft certifications under government control.
  • Anthropologist Giovanna Gasparello said the proposalโ€™s language gives the state broad powers over Indigenous peoples despite its stated support for self-determination and autonomy.

A proposed Mexican law intended to recognize the rights of Indigenous and Afro-Mexican peoples has drawn criticism over the power it would give the state to define and regulate Indigenous crafts and communities.

The issue arose during a lengthy discussion of the initiative at the National Institute of Anthropology and History, or INAH. The session, titled โ€œIndigenous Rights or Republic of Indians?โ€, was organized by researcher Bolfy Cottom at INAHโ€™s Directorate of Historical Studies. Daniela Lucio, a specialist from the Faculty of Law, addressed the proposalโ€™s treatment of intellectual property linked to Indigenous artisans.

Is this law a recognition or is it really an attempt to regulate certain things that go off on a tangent? In the end, the state will decide the value, not the consultations, not the peoples.

· Daniela LucioThe Faculty of Law specialist criticized provisions giving the government authority over craft certifications and value.

Lucio said the bill would create a royalty fund from craft sales, but the government, rather than the artisans, would administer the money. She also criticized a provision under which the state would certify whether a product qualifies as a craft, determine its category and assign its value. โ€œIs this law a recognition or is it really an attempt to regulate certain things that go off on a tangent? In the end, the state will decide the value, not the consultations, not the peoples,โ€ she said.

The initiative is riddled with โ€˜the state may, the state may,โ€™ so it becomes unclear whether these are rights or obligations.

· Giovanna GasparelloThe anthropologist criticized the proposalโ€™s language and the powers it would grant the state.

Anthropologist Giovanna Gasparello said the proposal contains more than 450 articles, most of which she described as โ€œfluff.โ€ She argued that it would give the state authority over the administration of Indigenous peoples. โ€œThe initiative is riddled with โ€˜the state may, the state may,โ€™ so it becomes unclear whether these are rights or obligations,โ€ she said.

Gasparello also pointed to a contradiction between the billโ€™s promise to promote the free determination and autonomy of Indigenous peoples and its plan for the government to decide which communities qualify. A government ruling would place them in a National Catalogue of Indigenous Peoples. โ€œA catalogue is an extremely colonial tool,โ€ she said. The discussion also noted that the bill would recognize the Bastรณn de Mando, an ancestral Indigenous practice now included in political events, a practice the article says began with Andrรฉs Manuel Lรณpez Obrador and continues under Claudia Sheinbaum.

A catalogue is an extremely colonial tool.

· Giovanna GasparelloGasparello objected to the proposed National Catalogue of Indigenous Peoples.
About this summary

Originally published by El Universal in Spanish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.