Fiji Police Force Rejects Claims of Systemic Corruption
Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- The Fiji Police Force has refuted claims of systemic corruption within the organization.
- Acting Deputy Police Commissioner Meli Sateki stated that alleged misconduct involves individual officers and is handled through established investigative procedures.
- Sateki emphasized that corruption is not part of the force's culture and that officers accused of corruption undergo a thorough investigation process before any action is taken.
The Fiji Police Force has firmly rejected allegations that corruption is a systemic issue within its ranks. Acting Deputy Police Commissioner Meli Sateki asserted that any instances of misconduct involve individual officers rather than being an organizational problem.
Corruption was not part of the Fiji Police Force's culture and should not be viewed as an organizational problem.
Appearing before the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and Defence during a review of the Fiji Police Force's 2021โ2022 Annual Report, Sateki addressed concerns raised by Committee Member Penioni Ravunawa regarding reports of corruption and misconduct. Sateki clarified that corruption is not embedded in the force's culture.
"We have a process that anyone who is alleged, and there is a case against a police officer on corruption, and there is credible evidence, after that process through to the Office of the Director of Public Prosecution, there is a process for the person to be set aside from work," Sateki explained. He stressed that while complaints are received, each allegation is rigorously assessed and investigated.
We have a process that anyone who is alleged, and there is a case against a police officer on corruption, and there is credible evidence, after that process through to the Office of the Director of Public Prosecution, there is a process for the person to be set aside from work.
Sateki further elaborated that officers are suspended to allow for a proper investigation, emphasizing that no one is dismissed without credible information, evidence, and sanction from an independent oversight body like the Office of the Director of Public Prosecution. The organization remains committed to maintaining professional standards and ensuring accountability for any officer found to have breached the law.
But to send somebody directly home without having credible information, without evidence, without being sanctioned from an independent oversight, like the Office of the Director of Public Prosecution, itโs something that we donโt encourage.
Originally published by FBC News in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.