Fiji's tourism spending questioned amid MSME support concerns

Fiji's significant financial contribution to regional tourism promotion, including an annual commitment of $20,000 to $40,000 for the South Pacific Tourism Organisation office and the South Pacific Tourism Exchange, has come under parliamentary scrutiny. Deputy Prime Minister and Tourism Minister Viliame Gavoka defended the expenditure, framing it as essential for Fiji's role as a regional hub that ensures Pacific-wide market access.

“

Fiji remains a principal funder of the South Pacific Tourism Organisation office in Suva and contributes about $20,000 to $40,000 annually to support the exchange.

The recent South Pacific Tourism Exchange 2026 in Nadi reportedly achieved record participation, with over 225 delegates, including senior decision-makers from international markets. The event featured an Industry Day focused on key tourism topics and introduced a Women in Business Showcase to boost market access for women-led enterprises. Support was also provided for smaller island states with limited capacity to attend such events.

“

This year’s program included an Industry Day focused on aviation, sustainability, digital marketing and crisis management. A Women in Business Showcase was also introduced to improve market access for women-led enterprises across six Pacific countries.

However, opposition members of Parliament raised concerns about the tangible benefits for micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs). They highlighted persistent challenges such as high logistics costs, limited production capacity, and unequal access to international buyers, arguing these factors hinder meaningful participation despite inclusion initiatives. Minister Gavoka stated that MSMEs are integrated through regional booths and partner support, with additional government assistance for selected local exhibitors.

“

Opposition MPs cited challenges including high logistics costs, limited production capacity and unequal access to international buyers, arguing these continue to restrict meaningful participation despite inclusion efforts.