Finnish coalition parties question SDP MP's social care savings plan

Proposals by Finnish Social Democratic Party (SDP) MP Aki Lindén to achieve significant savings in social and healthcare services have drawn sharp criticism from parties within the governing coalition. Lindén, who has a background in healthcare, suggested in an interview that the next term could see savings of up to 1 billion euros, partly by reducing the wellbeing services index.

This index adjusts regional funding annually based on the cost of living. Lindén argued that curbing this funding would compel wellbeing regions to find more efficient ways to organize services. Before entering parliament, Lindén served as the director of the Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District.

Anna-Kaisa Ikonen, Minister of Municipal and Regional Affairs from the National Coalition Party, called Lindén's proposal contradictory. "For three years, the government's cost-effectiveness and efficiency-boosting policies have been attacked. Now, proposals are being made for cuts of up to a billion euros in social and healthcare services, while new obligations are also being suggested for the regions," Ikonen stated, expressing surprise.

“

For three years, the government's cost-effectiveness and efficiency-boosting policies have been attacked. Now, proposals are being made for cuts of up to a billion euros in social and healthcare services, while new obligations are also being suggested for the regions.

Lindén's proposals also included measures that would increase spending, such as reinstating a two-week treatment guarantee and raising the staffing ratio for elderly care. Ikonen criticized the increased staffing ratio, warning that it could lead to a shortage of caregivers for home care. Henrik Wickström, a member of the Swedish People's Party's social and healthcare committee, described the SDP's proposals as surprising, noting that they also included tightening conditions for social security for immigrants.

While Wickström did not directly support Lindén's proposed index cut, he acknowledged the need to examine indices. "If a billion is taken away, not everything can remain the same or at least new obligations cannot be added," he commented, suggesting that if cuts are made, services and their associated costs must be scrutinized.

“

If a billion is taken away, not everything can remain the same or at least new obligations cannot be added.