Finnish Politics Needs Authenticity, Not Idealized Images

Finnish politics still operates within a restrictive mold, especially for young women, who frequently encounter condescension and personal attacks that derail substantive discussions. This is the view of Amalia Skarp Ruonakoski, writing in Helsingin Sanomat.

Ruonakoski recounts her own experience entering politics at 16, quickly adopting a persona deemed necessary for success. She even contemplated foregoing a tattoo due to concerns about its impact on her credibility. While acknowledging the importance of professionalism and responsibility, she stresses that individuals should have the freedom to express themselves and protect their privacy without facing relentless criticism.

"I miss more authenticity and relatable figures in politics," Ruonakoski writes. "I don't think we need more idealized images, but rather people who are themselves, who feel, express themselves, and see things humanly, and who are allowed to make mistakes."

The opinion piece suggests that the narrow definition of a politician persists, despite some signs of change. Ruonakoski calls for a political landscape that embraces genuine human qualities, allowing for vulnerability and personal expression alongside professional duties.

“

I miss more authenticity and relatable figures in politics. I don't think we need more idealized images, but rather people who are themselves, who feel, express themselves, and see things humanly, and who are allowed to make mistakes.