DistantNews
Support us
Former Deputy AG allegedly received $40 million from businessman
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Indonesia /Crime & Justice

Former Deputy AG allegedly received $40 million from businessman

From CNN Indonesia · () Indonesian

Translated from Indonesian and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.

At a glance

News Sources not specified In the courts
  • Former Deputy Attorney General for Special Crimes, Febrie Adriansyah, allegedly received Rp40 billion from businessman Tan Kian.
  • The money was reportedly given in connection with the corruption cases involving PT ASABRI and PT Jiwasrawaya.
  • A pretrial hearing judge stated that witness testimony regarding the money transfer could be considered sufficient preliminary evidence, but the judge did not rule on the truth of the money being given.

A pretrial hearing has revealed allegations that Febrie Adriansyah, the former Deputy Attorney General for Special Crimes, received Rp40 billion (approximately $2.7 million USD) from businessman Tan Kian. The alleged payment is linked to the ongoing corruption investigations into state-owned companies PT ASABRI and PT Jiwasraya.

During the hearing at the South Jakarta District Court, Presiding Judge Richard Edwin Basoeki noted that investigators had gathered testimony from witnesses about communications between Adriansyah and parties involved in the corruption cases. According to the judge, Tan Kian provided testimony about handing over Rp40 billion in Singapore dollars to Adriansyah.

The testimony regarding the request for a sum of money, the testimony regarding the handover of Singapore Dollar currency equivalent to approximately Rp40 billion, as well as documents and transaction and communication data that according to the investigators are consistent.

โ€” Richard Edwin BasoekiThe Presiding Judge of the South Jakarta District Court's pretrial hearing, explaining the evidence presented.

Judge Basoeki stated that this witness testimony, along with supporting documents and communication records, could be considered sufficient preliminary evidence, meeting the legal requirement of at least two pieces of evidence. However, the judge emphasized that the pretrial hearing's scope was limited to assessing the legality of the search, seizure, and suspect designation of Adriansyah, not to determine the veracity of the bribery allegations.

The judge also addressed Adriansyah's argument that no investigation occurred because he was never summoned as a witness or suspect. Basoeki clarified that Indonesian law does not require a suspect to be previously examined for an investigation to be considered valid. Furthermore, the judge found no grounds to invalidate the search warrant, despite a discrepancy in the document numbers, as it did not affect the scope or location of the search.

The investigation within Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code does not require that a person who later becomes a suspect must first be examined as a condition for the existence of an investigation.

โ€” Richard Edwin BasoekiThe judge clarifying the legal definition of an investigation in response to the suspect's argument.
About this summary

Originally published by CNN Indonesia in Indonesian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.