Former PM Bennett backs civil marriage, public transport on Shabbat in Israel
Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
TLDR
- Former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett expressed support for civil marriage and allowing cities to decide on public transportation during Shabbat, drawing criticism from ultra-Orthodox parties.
- Bennett's stance on civil marriage aims to enable all Israelis to marry within the country, addressing the current system where many couples travel abroad for civil ceremonies.
- The article highlights the political implications of Bennett's remarks, including praise from left-wing parties and sharp condemnation from religious parties concerned about preserving the state's Jewish identity.
From the perspective of The Jerusalem Post, Naftali Bennett's recent statements advocating for civil marriage and public transport on Shabbat represent a significant, albeit potentially controversial, shift in the Israeli political landscape. His party, Bennett 2026, is positioned to challenge the status quo ahead of upcoming elections, and these policy proposals aim to appeal to a broader, more secular electorate.
We should allow cities to choose whether they want public transportation on Shabbat.
The push for civil marriage directly addresses a long-standing issue for many Israelis, particularly same-sex couples and those seeking alternatives to religious-only marriage. The current system, which mandates marriage and divorce through religious authorities, forces many to seek civil ceremonies abroad, a situation Bennett argues is unfair and impractical. His call for 'common sense and fairness' resonates with those who feel constrained by the religious status quo.
Every person in Israel should be able to realize their love in this country and not have to travel abroad.
Bennett's remarks on public transportation during Shabbat also touch upon a deeply sensitive issue in Israel, where Shabbat observance is a cornerstone of national identity for many. By suggesting that cities should have the autonomy to decide on public transport, he attempts to balance religious tradition with the practical needs of a modern, diverse society. This pragmatic approach, however, immediately drew sharp criticism from haredi parties, who view such concessions as a threat to the Jewish character of the state.
My guiding principle on this issue is common sense and fairness.
The reactions from other political figures, like Yair Golan of the Democrats Party, underscore the ideological divides. Golan's praise highlights the support Bennett's proposals have garnered from the left, framing them as steps towards a more liberal and democratic Israel. Conversely, the Shas Party's strong condemnation reveals the deep-seated opposition from religious factions, who see these changes as an erosion of Jewish tradition and potentially a slippery slope towards compromising national and territorial integrity. This debate encapsulates the ongoing tension between religious and secular values in Israel, a central theme in the country's political discourse.
Civil marriage in a liberal democratic state is a given. This is our Judaism, and we will demand it in the basic guidelines of the next government.
Originally published by Jerusalem Post. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.