DistantNews
Former Prosecutor Kim Sang-min's Appeal Trial Concludes; Lee Ufan Painting to be Presented

Former Prosecutor Kim Sang-min's Appeal Trial Concludes; Lee Ufan Painting to be Presented

From Dong-A Ilbo · (16h ago) Korean

Translated from Korean, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

TLDR

  • The appellate court is concluding the trial of former prosecutor Kim Sang-min, who is accused of accepting bribes related to artwork and campaign funding.
  • The prosecution plans to present a painting by artist Lee Ufan as evidence, with plans to verify its authenticity in court.
  • Kim Sang-min faces charges including violating the anti-graft law and the political fund law, with the first trial acquitting him on the art-related bribery charge due to insufficient evidence.

The legal proceedings surrounding former prosecutor Kim Sang-min are reaching a critical juncture as the appellate court prepares to conclude the trial. At the heart of the case lie serious allegations, including bribery related to a valuable artwork by the renowned artist Lee Ufan and violations of the political fund law concerning campaign expenses.

The prosecution team argued that the painting might not be subject to customs duties, suggesting the possibility of no customs declaration.

— Prosecution teamThe prosecution's response to the defense's request for customs records.

The prosecution's strategy appears focused on presenting the Lee Ufan painting, reportedly valued at 140 million won, as key evidence. The plan to present this artwork in court and call an appraiser to testify about its authenticity underscores the significance of this piece in the legal battle. However, Kim's defense has contested the painting's authenticity and its valuation, arguing it should be considered less than 1 million won, thereby falling outside the scope of the anti-graft law.

Adding complexity to the case is the differing interpretation of evidence. The prosecution contends that the painting might not have undergone customs declaration, explaining the lack of customs records. Conversely, Kim's defense has requested customs records, highlighting a discrepancy in how the evidence is being handled and interpreted. The initial trial's acquittal on the bribery charge, citing a lack of direct evidence of Kim handing the painting to the First Lady, adds another layer to the ongoing legal drama.

The defense argued that the painting is a forgery, and therefore its value should not be assessed at 140 million won. They claimed that based on its actual value, it would be less than 1 million won, thus not constituting a violation of the anti-graft law.

— Kim Sang-min's defense teamThe defense's argument regarding the painting's authenticity and value.

Beyond the art-related charges, Kim also faces accusations of receiving campaign vehicle expenses from an individual known as 'Zombie Kim' or 'Coin King.' The first trial found him guilty on this charge, sentencing him to six months in prison with a one-year suspended sentence and ordering the forfeiture of over 41.39 million won. The appellate court's final decision will be keenly watched, as it will determine the ultimate fate of Kim Sang-min and potentially shed light on the intricate dealings alleged in this high-profile case.

There is no evidence that Kim handed the painting by artist Lee Ufan to Mrs. Kim (First Lady).

— First trial courtThe reason for acquitting Kim Sang-min on the charge of seeking political appointments by giving the painting to the First Lady.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Dong-A Ilbo in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.