DistantNews
Support us
German newspaper FAZ clarifies correspondent's controversial question on killing Russian soldiers
๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ธ Serbia /Conflict & Security

German newspaper FAZ clarifies correspondent's controversial question on killing Russian soldiers

From N1 Serbia · () Serbian

Translated from Serbian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Sources not specified Context piece
  • German newspaper FAZ clarified that a question posed by its correspondent about killing Russian soldiers was poorly formulated and not the outlet's editorial stance.
  • The question, asked to Ukrainian President Zelenskyy, was intended to explore how to pressure Russia into peace talks through military means, according to FAZ.
  • FAZ supports Ukraine's right to self-defense and calls for an end to Russian aggression, while acknowledging the question's phrasing caused controversy, particularly in Moscow.

German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ) issued a clarification after its correspondent Michael Martens asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at a press conference in Belgrade whether Europeans could help Ukraine kill more Russian soldiers. The newspaper stated the question was poorly formulated and does not reflect its editorial position.

However, the question was poorly formulated, for which we apologize. It is not FAZ's editorial stance that as many Russian soldiers as possible should be killed.

โ€” FAZ statementFAZ's official clarification regarding correspondent Michael Martens' question to Ukrainian President Zelenskyy.

FAZ explained that Martens' question was meant to address ongoing discussions among defense experts about how to pressure the Russian military through personnel attrition to force peace negotiations. The outlet regrets the imprecise wording of the question.

FAZ supports Ukraine's right to self-defense, which is guaranteed by international law, and calls for the swiftest possible end to Russian aggression.

โ€” FAZ statementFAZ's official clarification regarding correspondent Michael Martens' question to Ukrainian President Zelenskyy.

Martens himself shared FAZ's statement on Twitter, emphasizing that the newspaper supports Ukraine's right to self-defense under international law and desires a swift end to Russian aggression. He noted that the question, posed after being called upon by an advisor as the only non-Serbian or non-Ukrainian journalist, sparked discussion.

Perhaps Michael wanted to emphasize the significance of the topic he raised. I assume he wanted to say that Europe has not helped Ukraine enough, that this aid is not effective enough to resist.

โ€” Veran Matiฤ‡Serbian journalist Veran Matiฤ‡'s interpretation of Michael Martens' intention behind his question.

Serbian journalist Veran Matiฤ‡ commented that while Martens has the right to his questions, he personally would not have phrased it that way for ethical reasons. Matiฤ‡ suggested Martens aimed to highlight Europe's insufficient aid to Ukraine and that wars are unfortunately won by killing people. He believes Martens prepared the question and likely had an indication he would be allowed to ask it, possibly due to his good communication with President Vuฤiฤ‡. Matiฤ‡ also noted the question's resonance in Moscow could complicate Vuฤiฤ‡'s relations with Russia.

Wars are won by killing people.

โ€” Michael MartensMartens' explanation on social media about the nature of warfare, following the controversy over his question.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by N1 Serbia in Serbian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.